InAmerica students win big at the Scholastic Awards thanks to expert mentorship, thoughtful coaching, and a commitment to creative excellence. InAmerica Education , a premier academic and admissions consulting firm founded in 2013, is proud to announce its continued success in guiding students to national recognition through the Scholastic Art & Writing Awards. With dozens of students receiving Gold and Silver Keys, and many more earning Honorable Mentions, InAmerica continues to distinguish itself as a leader in creative and academic mentorship. Founded in 1923, the Scholastic Art & Writing Awards are the nation’s longest-running and most prestigious program recognizing creative teens. These awards have celebrated the early work of luminaries like Andy Warhol, Sylvia Plath, and Stephen King. Each year, hundreds of thousands of submissions are reviewed by panels of creative professionals, with only the most exceptional works awarded. Receiving a Scholastic award is a significant achievement, and for students working with InAmerica, that achievement is becoming the norm. InAmerica’s standout success is not coincidental. It is the result of thoughtful leadership, deeply personalized mentorship, and a tireless work ethic from its team of seasoned consultants. Students are matched with expert mentors who guide them through the ideation, drafting, and revision process, helping them not only develop polished submissions but also deeper confidence in their own creative voices. The process is rigorous, yet empowering. “Helping students find and refine their voice is at the core of what we do,” says Yang Yu, Consultant of College Preparations and Enrichment at InAmerica. “It’s not about chasing awards—it’s about teaching students to pursue excellence with clarity, depth, and integrity. The recognition simply follows.” The firm’s comprehensive approach includes early brainstorming, genre-specific coaching, detailed editorial feedback, and submission management. This structure not only supports students artistically but also prepares them to translate these experiences into compelling narratives for college applications and beyond. InAmerica’s extraordinary record of success with the Scholastic Awards affirms what families have long trusted: when students are nurtured with purpose, structure, and expertise, they thrive. And in the case of Scholastic, they shine.

Recently, the announcement of the 2025 Nobel Prize winners captivated audiences worldwide. Fourteen remarkable individuals from diverse fields showcased their groundbreaking contributions to humanity. The six prestigious categories—Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Economic Sciences, Literature, and Peace—emphasize the exceptional achievements of these laureates. Their success can be closely tied to some of the world’s top educational institutions. These universities not only shaped their minds but also fostered an atmosphere of innovation and excellence. In this post, we will uncover the educational backgrounds of the 2025 Nobel Prize winners and reveal the secrets of their universities' success. The Physics Prize Winners The Physics Prize awarded this year went to three distinguished scientists, each representing the legacy of their outstanding educational institutions. John Clarke John Clarke earned his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in 1968. Now a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, his groundbreaking work with superconducting quantum interference devices has transformed the field of physics. For instance, these devices have practical applications in areas like quantum computing and medical imaging. Michel H. Devoret Michel H. Devoret received his doctorate from Paris-Sud University in 1982 and is currently a professor at Yale University and the University of California, Santa Barbara. His influential research in macroscopic quantum tunneling and single-electron pumping has paved the way for advancements in quantum technologies. John M. Martinis John M. Martinis completed his Ph.D. at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1987. He focuses on the quantum behavior of macroscopic variables, contributing to significant progress in quantum computing. Under his guidance, research teams achieved a 99.9% success rate in quantum operations, a milestone in the field. The Chemistry Prize Winners The Chemistry Prize honored three remarkable chemists who exemplify the importance of a strong academic foundation. Susumu Kitagawa A graduate of Kyoto University, Susumu Kitagawa earned his Ph.D. in 1979 and is now a prominent professor at the Kyoto University Institute for Advanced Study (KUIAS). He is widely recognized for his leadership in inorganic chemistry, particularly his work on metal-organic frameworks, which has applications in gas storage and separation. Richard Robson Richard Robson obtained his bachelor's and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Oxford. For over 50 years, he has been a member of the faculty at the University of Melbourne's Department of Chemistry. His theoretical framework for designing metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has laid a vital foundation for advancements in areas such as catalysis and drug delivery. Omar M. Yaghi Omar M. Yaghi is a chair professor at the University of California, Berkeley, recognized as a leader in reticular chemistry. His innovative studies in this field have led to the development of new materials that can store hydrogen and capture carbon dioxide, helping the fight against climate change. The Physiology or Medicine Prize Winners The Physiology or Medicine Prize was awarded to three researchers whose educational paths showcase their dedication to improving human health. Mary E. Brunkow Mary E. Brunkow earned her bachelor's degree in Molecular and Cellular Biology from the University of Washington and her Ph.D. from Princeton University. Her research investigates the molecular mechanisms of genetic diseases and skeletal development. One study she published revealed crucial insights into a genetic disorder affecting one in every 2,000 births. Fred Ramsdell Fred Ramsdell completed his Ph.D. at the University of California, Los Angeles, in 1987. Currently, he serves as a scientific advisor at Sonoma Biotherapeutics in San Francisco. His work on T-cell activation and tolerance has important implications for therapies in autoimmune diseases, showing promise in clinical trials. Shimon Sakaguchi Shimon Sakaguchi received his medical doctorate from Kyoto University in 1983. As a professor at Osaka University’s Center for the Study of Immunology, his research on immune responses has greatly advanced our understanding of various diseases, particularly autoimmune disorders. The Economic Sciences Prize Winners The Economic Sciences Prize highlighted three economists whose academic backgrounds significantly shaped their impactful research. Joel Mokyr Joel Mokyr obtained his Ph.D. from Yale University and is currently a professor at Northwestern University. He specializes in the interaction between technology and economic growth, illustrating how innovation drives economic progress, which has implications for policymakers around the world. Philippe Aghion Philippe Aghion earned his Ph.D. from Harvard University and holds professorships at several prestigious institutions. His work has provided fresh theoretical frameworks for macroeconomic policy, influencing decisions in countries across Europe. Peter Howitt Peter Howitt completed his Ph.D. at Northwestern University and is now a professor at Brown University. His contributions to macroeconomic policy and economic growth are widely respected, as he has addressed issues related to unemployment and productivity in his research. The Literature Prize Winner The Literature Prize was awarded to a talented writer whose educational journey reflects deep engagement with literary traditions. László Krasznahorkai Hungarian author László Krasznahorkai graduated from Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary's leading institution. His celebrated works, such as "Satan's Tango" and "The World Goes On," illustrate the profound depth of human experience, resonating with readers globally. The Peace Prize Winner The Peace Prize was awarded to a political figure whose educational background emphasizes the significance of social sciences. Maria Corina Machado Maria Corina Machado, a Venezuelan politician and industrial engineer, studied at Andrés Bello Catholic University, a leading institution in Venezuela. Initially earning her degree in industrial engineering, she later pursued finance studies, which prepared her for a career focused on social justice and governance in her country. The Dominance of U.S. Universities A closer look at the 2025 Nobel Prize winners reveals a striking trend: the overwhelming presence of the University of California system. This esteemed public university network has produced five Nobel laureates this year alone. With a rich history of nurturing talent, the University of California system has been awarded a total of 75 Nobel Prizes to its faculty and alumni. This success stems from robust public funding, which encourages long-term scientific exploration without the pressure of immediate commercial returns. Currently, the UC system, comprising ten campuses, serves nearly 295,000 students with a dedicated faculty of around 265,000. This vast environment fosters a pool of talent and resources, facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation that enhances the educational experience. The Secrets Behind Top-Tier Universities What are the secrets to the success of these prestigious institutions in producing Nobel laureates? Several critical factors contribute to their ability to cultivate exceptional talent. Rigorous Academic Standards Top universities maintain high academic standards, ensuring that only the most principled and capable students are admitted. This rigorous selection process fosters an atmosphere of excellence, pushing students to strive for greatness. Research Opportunities Students and faculty at leading universities have access to state-of-the-art research facilities and funding. This emphasis on research elevates the overall academic experience and drives groundbreaking discoveries that can change the world. Interdisciplinary Collaboration Encouraging collaboration across various fields allows students and faculty to tackle complex problems collectively. This approach often cultivates innovative solutions and creates new areas of exploration. Strong Mentorship Many institutions feature experienced faculty members who are leaders in their fields, offering invaluable mentorship. This guidance is crucial for students as they navigate their academic and professional paths. Global Networks Prestigious universities often maintain extensive global networks, empowering students to connect with peers and professionals worldwide. These connections can lead to collaborative research efforts and broaden students' experiences. Summary The 2025 Nobel Prize winners exemplify what can be achieved through a strong educational foundation. The influence of their universities is evident in their pioneering work and enduring contributions to society. As we examine the educational journeys of these laureates, we see that the success of top-tier universities hinges on their commitment to academic excellence, research opportunities, interdisciplinary collaboration, strong mentorship, and global networks. Looking ahead, we must continue to invest in education and create environments that nurture talent and innovation. The stories of these Nobel laureates remind us of the profound impact education can have on individuals and society as a whole.

As U.S. undergraduate early‑application (ED/EA) deadlines approach, many students and families are finalizing materials under tight timelines. Carefully curate your activities section: Common App allows up to ten entries, and you should fill as many slots as possible, but avoid mechanically listing every participation. Prioritize activities by significance—place those that best reflect your character or tie directly to your main essay near the top to create stronger impressions on admissions readers. In the limited description space, avoid repeating similar items and strive to demonstrate breadth and depth across different dimensions; draft and refine entries in a separate document before pasting them into the application to ensure precision and consistent formatting. Essays remain central to your application, so in the final days devote time to a careful read through of your personal statement and all supplemental responses. Proofread meticulously for spelling, grammar, and factual details, and seek final reviews from a counselor, teacher, or a trusted peer. Complete each school’s specific prompts with targeted answers and double‑check institutional names, program titles, and other school‑specific references. Note that the Additional Information field has been reduced this year from 650 to 300 words; with less space, be more selective and concise about what you choose to highlight, focusing on the most compelling and distinctive aspects of your profile. Be aware of new optional supplements such as the Dialogue Portfolio, which several top universities (for example, Northwestern, University of Chicago, Johns Hopkins, Washington University in St. Louis, and Colby) have introduced. If you are applying to those schools, consider the Dialogue Portfolio as a potential plus—especially if you have debate, Model UN, or related experience—but do not let it detract from polishing your core application materials; maintain clear priorities. Verify standardized testing, language score, and transcript requirements for each target school, since policies and minimum section scores vary. Some institutions set explicit sectional thresholds and require official reporting by specific deadlines; plan to send scores at least a week before the application deadline. Given the upcoming TOEFL redesign next year, aim to secure strong scores this cycle if possible. Although school staff typically send transcripts before the November 1 deadline for early applicants, take personal responsibility to confirm that your transcript and any counselor or school reports have been submitted. Check every piece of personal information for accuracy before submitting: basic fields—especially numeric entries such as birthdate, GPA, graduation year, and test dates—are common sources of error. After completing all sections and paying application fees, use the Review page to confirm all information and complete the Common App electronic signature to finalize submission. Keep in mind that payment processing can fail or reverse within 24 hours, so submit with enough lead time to resolve any payment issues. The results of Early Decision (ED) are usually announced in mid-December. Applicants need to be mentally prepared for different outcomes: ✅ Admission: This means you have secured a place at the school and can no longer apply to other schools through regular decision (unless you applied through the non-binding EA). Be sure to confirm your admission and follow up on the enrollment procedures promptly. ✅ Deferral: Some schools may transfer your ED application to the regular decision pool, which means you still have a chance to be admitted, but you should prepare to submit additional materials if required. ✅ Rejection: If unfortunately rejected, don’t be discouraged! You can still apply to other schools through the regular decision (RD) process and continue to refine and strengthen your application materials. To help students plan more effectively for Fall 2025, we have summarized application decision dates for the Top 50 comprehensive universities and Top 30 liberal arts colleges across different rounds. We recommend parents and students to keep this as a reference and save it! Good luck to all students! Stay positive and keep striving for success.

Top-tier U.S. private schools are sought after by countless families aspiring to provide their children with a high-quality American education. These schools are known for their strong academic programs, rich resources, excellent college placement, and extensive networks. Recently, Niche, often referred to as the "Yelp of U.S. Education" and one of the most reputed ranking websites for K-12 education, released the 2026 ranking of K-12 schools. Let's explore Niche's latest Top 30 in full detail: This year, The Brearley School, which ranked third last year, took the champion's position, becoming the MVP among traditional elite schools. Over recent years, Brearley has consistently remained in the top ten across various private school rankings, marking a stable performance. It rightfully ascends to the top spot this year. Riverdale Country School, a longstanding top day school, dropped one rank to second. Horace Mann School, beloved by many parents, improved significantly by four places, ranking fourth. The top 10 schools largely remain unchanged from last year, aside from a few shifts in positions. Sidwell Friends School, although only improving by one position, broke into the top ten—considered a significant leap! The most surprising entry in the Top 10 is Oak Crest Academy - Pomona, a "dark horse," leaping straight to the 8th spot from relative obscurity, even surpassing long-standing top 20 schools like The Dalton School. The Village School, another one to watch, advanced four ranks from last year’s 19th position, now in the Top 15! It has performed well on other Niche lists, yet maintains lower domestic attention and competition compared to consistently top 30 schools, making it friendlier for international applicants. It’s worth considering for families looking to "catch a break" in top-tier private education. A notable drop was seen in Trinity School, which fell from the top 10 to 20th place this year. Why Are Niche Rankings Worth Referencing? Niche's school rankings are popular among American families mainly because they consider the authentic reviews from students and parents. The rankings are based on millions of online reviews annually, in addition to data from the U.S. Department of Education, FBI, Census Bureau, and other public databases. This year, the site published its evaluation criteria: The factor contributing most to the rankings is the Top College Admission Index, accounting for 32.6%. This is followed by the percentage of graduates entering four-year colleges, at 21.2%. Culture & Diversity, Student & Parent Surveys, and Student-Teacher Ratio each account for 15.4%, reflecting importance as well. Culture & Diversity is assessed based on racial and economic diversity and evaluations from students and parents. Surveys evaluate school experiences, scored from 1 to 5. The student-teacher ratio indicates the richness of school educational resources and the skew towards personalized or group teaching. Niche’s updates are recognized for their authenticity, dimensional evaluation criteria, and timely updates, held in high regard within the U.S. K-12 education sector. That said, when choosing a school, the significance behind the rankings should take precedence. It's vital to understand the weight of each ranking factor and choose based on what is most important for you. For example, some rankings may focus on geographical location, alumni funding, and student-teacher ratio, while you might prioritize boarding rates or international student proportions. Rankings should serve as a reference, acting as a measure of compatibility between the child and the school, rather than the ultimate standard for selection. Choosing the right school involves considering personal needs in conjunction with the ranking criteria weight. Some families might insist on getting into a top-ranked school, but such a mindset could hinder finding the right match. Rankings are influenced by numerous factors with different dimensions.

With the matriculation of the 2025 Fall class underway, major Ivy League institutions in the United States have begun releasing data for the Class of 2029, revealing emerging trends in the latest admissions cycle. Analysis of application volumes, admit rates, academic profiles, and popular majors highlights the selection preferences of these elite universities. Despite pressure from the Trump administration targeting elite colleges, data reported by Princeton, Harvard, Columbia, Brown, and other Ivies indicate that their attractiveness remains undiminished and the proportion of international students has held steady. What insights can be drawn from the official figures disclosed by these institutions, and how should future applicants prepare? Below, we examine the data to glean key takeaways. Princeton University Princeton received 42,303 applications for the Class of 2029, the largest application pool in the university’s history. This cohort marks the final year of Princeton’s announced undergraduate enrollment expansion, which increased the size of incoming classes by 500 students over four years. The overall yield rate was 75.2%, a 0.2 percentage-point decrease from last year; the SCEA (Single-Choice Early Action) yield was 91.2%, down 1 percentage point from the prior year. Princeton’s Class of 2029 consists of 1,409 matriculants, with international students comprising 14.1% of the class — a 2.1 percentage-point increase year-over-year. These international students represent 65 countries, including Croatia, India, Kenya, New Zealand, and South Korea. In the officially reported racial/ethnic composition, the share of Asian American students rose, while the proportions of White and Black students declined; Latino/Hispanic and multiracial student shares remained stable. Regarding degree interests, 65.7% of incoming students indicated interest in an A.B. (Bachelor of Arts) degree; 27.3% indicated interest in a B.S.E. (Bachelor of Science in Engineering); the remainder reported being undecided. Harvard University Despite intensified scrutiny and targeting from the Trump administration, Harvard’s yield for the Class of 2029 reached 85% — a 1 percentage-point increase from last year and a recent high. As of May 27, Harvard had enrolled 1,654 students. Although the institution has been a focal point of government pressure, the share of international first-year students remained largely stable at 15.8%. While this represents a slight decline from the previous year, it remains within the 15–18% range observed over the past three years. In response to escalating federal actions affecting international applicants, Harvard implemented several measures: Permitting admitted international students to hold acceptance offers from multiple universities concurrently; Continuing to admit students from waitlists after the usual June 30 deadline; Increasing admissions offers by approximately 25–30 students to anticipate that some admitted international students might be unable to secure visas. Geographically, the East Coast continues to be Harvard’s primary recruiting base: the Mid-Atlantic region accounts for 20% of the incoming class, New England 18%, the South 16%, the Pacific Coast 13%, the Midwest 12%, and Mountain states 3%. Among the Class of 2029, declared and intended concentrations are distributed as follows: Social Sciences: 34.6% Engineering: 25.5% Natural Sciences: 26.6% Humanities: 11.7% Columbia University During the 2025 Fall application cycle, Columbia University received 59,616 applications and ultimately admitted 2,946 students, yielding an overall admission rate of 4.94%, a modest increase compared with the past three years. Of the applicants, 5,872 applied through the Early Decision (ED) round. The Class of 2029 comprises 1,806 matriculants, with a matriculation (yield) rate of 61.3%. Among admitted students, 94% ranked in the top 10% of their high school senior classes. Although Columbia maintains a test-optional policy, among applicants who submitted standardized test scores the middle 50% range is SAT 1510–1560 and ACT 34–36. Columbia’s Class of 2029 exhibits notable global representation: international students constitute 16% of the class, hailing from 83 countries and territories. Academic interests among the incoming class are broadly distributed: Brown University Brown enrolled 2,418 students for the Class of 2029. The university received 42,765 applications, yielding an admission rate of 5.65%. Over the past five years Brown typically received roughly 50,000 applications per cycle; this year’s total is the lowest in five years, a decline closely associated with Brown’s reinstatement of standardized testing requirements. Overall, Brown’s overall admission rate has not exceeded 6% since the 2020–21 cycle. The incoming class represents 89 countries and territories, with Canada, China, the United Kingdom, India, and South Korea the largest sources of international matriculants. Sixty-four students will enter Brown’s distinctive eight-year liberal arts–medical education program, and 21 students will enroll in the dual-degree program with the Rhode Island School of Design. The Class of 2029 is Brown’s first cohort subject to the reinstated SAT/ACT requirement. The university reported score ranges for admitted first-year students who submitted tests: SAT middle 50%: 1480–1560 ACT middle 50%: 34–35 University of Pennsylvania The University of Pennsylvania enrolled 2,421 students in the Class of 2029; 51% of these admits were admitted through Early Decision (ED). This cycle’s applicant pool increased by approximately 11% compared with last year’s record high of over 65,000 applications, making it the largest applicant cohort in Penn’s history. Penn has not recently disclosed separate admit rates or admit counts for ED and Regular Decision (RD) rounds. According to prior Common Data Set information, last year a total of 3,508 students were admitted across both rounds, for an overall admission rate of 5.4%; Penn has not released this year’s comprehensive breakdown. For the current incoming class, the middle 50% SAT range is 1510–1560 and the middle 50% ACT range is 34–35. Yale University Among 50,228 applicants for the Class of 2029, Yale admitted 2,308 students, for an admission rate of 4.6%. In addition to newly admitted students, 38 students who deferred admission from the 2023–24 cycle will join this cohort. According to the incoming-class survey, 58% of respondents plan to major in STEM fields, 41.7% intend to major in social sciences, and 20.8% plan to major in the humanities; 5.7% remain undecided. The top five intended concentrations are: Engineering and Electrical Engineering (7.5%), Political Science (7.5%), Business/Management (6.7%), Economics (4.7%), and Mechanical Engineering (4.7%). Dartmouth College Dartmouth received 28,230 applications for the Class of 2029 and admitted 1,702 students, yielding an admission rate of 6.0%. This marks the fifth consecutive year Dartmouth received at least 28,000 undergraduate applications, though the total is down 11% from last year’s record 31,657. Dartmouth was the first Ivy to reinstate a requirement to submit SAT or ACT scores; the Class of 2029 is the first cohort in five years required to submit standardized-test results, which likely contributed to this year’s modest decline in applications. Among admitted students, 96% ranked in the top 10% of their high school class. More than one-quarter of the class are expected to serve as senior class representatives or give commencement addresses. Cornell University Cornell admitted 5,824 students for the Class of 2029, with final matriculation totaling 3,861 — the largest entering class in the university’s history. Cornell released limited additional detail, noting only that the number of admitted students increased 13.3% from last year’s 5,139 admits, and that the admitted pool is roughly twice the size of the Class of 2028. Data Analysis and Key Takeaways The Class of 2029 data released by the eight Ivy League schools reveal several clear trends: 1. Admit rates are rising; early applications confer a pronounced advantage Ivy League schools made modest enrollment increases to hedge against policy uncertainty. With some institutions reinstating standardized-testing requirements, overall application counts fell slightly, producing a modest rebound in admit rates—especially for early rounds. Early Decision/Early Action admit rates remain substantially higher than Regular Decision (e.g., Brown’s ED admit rate of 17.94% vs. RD 4.01%), underscoring the growing strategic importance of applying early. 2. International student representation remains stable or increases Despite intensified federal scrutiny of elite institutions, the share of international matriculants has held steady or risen at several Ivies. Princeton reported a record-high international share (14.1%); Columbia’s international share reached 16%. These figures indicate that top U.S. universities continue to prioritize and attract global talent. 3. Social sciences remain popular Across multiple Ivies, social sciences continue to be one of the most selected fields of study—Harvard reported 34.6% of its incoming class intending social-science concentrations; Columbia reported 28%. 4. Academic preparation remains fundamental Admissions continue to emphasize strong academic credentials: 94% of Columbia admits ranked in the top 10% of their high school classes, and Princeton highlighted applicants who pursue advanced coursework such as AP classes. Strong academic performance remains a foundational element of competitive Ivy applications. Conclusion Admission to Ivy League schools remains highly competitive, but the data suggest international opportunities are stable. With strategic planning, thorough preparation, and authentic presentation of strengths, qualified applicants remain well positioned to gain admission despite shifting policy environments.

In mid‑September (Sep. 16th – 20th) InAmerica Education participated in EMA 2025 in Austin as one of the event’s largest sponsors — our fourth consecutive year at this flagship conference for K–12 admissions professionals. This year’s theme, “Embracing Change,” framed conversations across the program as educators and admissions leaders examined how schools should adapt to shifting family priorities, new technologies, and evolving student needs. EMA (the Enrollment Management Association), the organization behind the SSAT, brings together nonprofit independent schools and admissions leaders from the U.S. and around the world, and Austin — a hotspot for early‑education innovation — proved a lively setting for discussions on AI in admissions, interview practice, campus priorities and family expectations. Our full K–12 team was on site to meet with more than 1,400 admissions leaders from top boarding and day schools, including The Lawrenceville School and Phillips Exeter Academy, to exchange firsthand information and practical admissions guidance. At the heart of our participation was a simple goal: convey the perspectives and priorities of Chinese families directly to school partners, while bringing back the latest policy updates and admissions tips to better support our applicants. (Top left: InAmerica Exclusive Booth, Top right: Iolani School Admission Officer, Botton left: The Lawrenceville School Admission Officer, Botton right: Episcopal High School) (Top left: The Ethel Walker School Admission Officer, Top right: St. Mark's School Admission Officer, Botton left: Vericant Interview Operations Director Ryan, Botton right: Phillips Exeter Academy Admission Officer) Our full K–12 team was on site to meet with more than 1,400 admissions leaders from top boarding and day schools, including The Lawrenceville School and Phillips Exeter Academy, to exchange firsthand information and practical admissions guidance. At the heart of our participation was a simple goal: convey the perspectives and priorities of Chinese families directly to school partners, while bringing back the latest policy updates and admissions tips to better support our applicants. In our featured session, “The Future of K‑12 Education: Gen Z & Gen Alpha Children,” K‑12 Admissions Director Nicolas Edwards and Senior Consultant Echo Ma outlined how family priorities are shifting — with a growing emphasis on mental health, real‑world problem solving, and long‑term development rather than narrow test outcomes. They explained how InAmerica positions itself as a strategic, bicultural partner: helping families present authentic narratives, advising on program fit, and building the school relationships that matter in K–12 admissions. The talk drew a full house and lively engagement. Audience members stayed to ask questions long after the session ended — a strong signal that these topics resonate across schools and regions. Why this matters for Chinese families K–12 admissions are relationship‑driven. Beyond transcripts and test scores, admissions teams want to understand family context, student character, and genuine fit. At EMA we emphasized the voices and priorities of Chinese families so schools can better understand cultural expectations and make informed evaluative decisions. For families, this direct dialogue shortens feedback loops and increases transparency around current admissions practices and what truly differentiates applicants. On the ground: insights, connections and culture Over the course of the conference we collected timely updates on application trends, interview practice changes, and how schools are integrating technology and wellbeing into their programs. We also deepened partnerships with admissions officers and strengthened channels that help our students access accurate, up‑to‑date school guidance. Dr. Frog Our mascot, Dr. Frog, proved unexpectedly popular at EMA, helping spark conversations and embodying the InAmerica values we bring to every partnership: Prosperity, Growth, Positivity. EMA 2025 reaffirmed that the K–12 landscape is changing quickly. InAmerica is committed to staying at the forefront of those changes — translating what we learn into clearer guidance, stronger school relationships, and better outcomes for Chinese families applying to U.S. independent schools. We look forward to sharing more of these insights with our community and to continuing the conversation at future conferences.

Navigating the college landscape can feel daunting for students and parents alike. With a flood of college rankings from sources like U.S. News and QS, how do you determine which ranking best fits your educational aspirations? As tuition increases and the job market grows more competitive, understanding the return on investment (ROI) is essential for informed decisions. The recently released Forbes Best Colleges ranking tackles these challenges head-on, offering insights into the value of a college degree. Forbes takes a distinctive approach to college rankings by focusing on commercial value and ROI. Unlike U.S. News, which ranks schools based on academic reputation, Forbes evaluates how well graduates perform in the real world. This perspective is especially relevant for families emphasizing value in their educational investments. In its rankings, Forbes looks at metrics like graduation rates, alumni salaries, and student debt loads, helping families gauge the financial impact of their college choices. Let’s explore the highlights of the top universities as ranked by Forbes this year. The Top Tier: MIT Takes the Lead The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) stands out at the top of the list, showcasing an impressive track record. MIT graduates have an average starting salary of $110,200 just three years after graduation. Notably, the school's freshman retention rate is an astounding 99.8% , indicating strong student satisfaction and support. After 20 years , alumni can expect a median salary of $197,000 , the highest in the nation among all colleges. Columbia University has also made significant strides, climbing from sixth to second place. Princeton now occupies the third spot, with other elite institutions like Harvard, Yale, and the University of Pennsylvania rounding out the top ten. Vanderbilt and Rice Shine Brightly Vanderbilt University and Rice University have soared into the top 15, moving up from their previous rankings in other evaluations. Their ascension underscores a growing recognition of their academic quality and career outcomes, further affirming their commitment to delivering value. Public Universities: The UC System Dominates The University of California system has made remarkable progress, with all eight campuses landing in the top 100 . UC Berkeley, UCLA, and UC San Diego have all made it into the top 20 . Other noteworthy public institutions include Georgia Tech, the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and the University of Michigan Ann Arbor. These public universities offer excellent options, especially for international students seeking high-quality education at competitive prices. Liberal arts colleges have also gained traction in this year's ranking. Williams College, for instance, has jumped an impressive ten spots to rank seventh nationally. With a median salary of $173,900 after 20 years, Williams demonstrates that liberal arts graduates can achieve strong financial returns. Furthermore, 24 liberal arts colleges made it to the top 100 , including Amherst College, Swarthmore College, and Wellesley College, all of which landed in the top 30 . Brigham Young University (BYU) is emerging as a surprising contender in this year's rankings. Known for its affordable tuition, averaging around $5,200 per year for in-state students, BYU offers a range of scholarships that significantly lower the financial burden. About 60% of students receive some form of financial aid, enhancing accessibility. Graduates of BYU enjoy impressive alumni salaries, and the university's location in Utah—a growing tech hub—offers graduates opportunities with major companies like Facebook and Google. The Forbes ranking serves as an invaluable guide for understanding the economic and career implications of attending certain colleges. It underscores the need for prospective students to consider not just academic quality but also the tangible benefits of their educational investments. Choosing the right college is crucial for future success. Instead of merely opting for the most prestigious school, focus on institutions that align with your personal and professional aspirations. A high ROI and strong employment prospects should be at the forefront of your decision-making. Ultimately, the goal of higher education should be more than just earning a degree. It's about finding the right fit for your ambitions and ensuring that you receive a solid return on your investment for years to come.

Generative AI is everywhere—helping students with homework, assisting teachers, and now even influencing who gets into top schools. For students seeking placement in the most competitive public and private high schools, this shift matters because AI is playing a growing role in how applications are reviewed, essays are read, and candidate readiness is assessed. Understanding how college admissions use AI can help your child stand out for all the right reasons. In this guide, we’ll show you what to know, what to watch for, and how to help your child present their most authentic, compelling self. How AI Is Affecting K–12 Education Generative AI is being introduced to students of all levels. Tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grammarly help students polish their language, brainstorm ideas for projects, and tutor students when they struggle with certain subjects. In fall 2023, it was reported that 18% of K–12 teachers used AI for teaching . This can help provide different scenarios for teaching subjects, to detect plagiarism or overuse of AI, and even to aid in the admissions process of private schools. However, this doesn’t mean that all of teaching is being handed over to AI; instead, it allows teachers to focus on developing essential skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and adaptability. Developing these skills will set students up for long-term success. AI will likely continue to play a large role in education. For example, in July, 2025, ChatGPT Study Mode was introduced specifically to help students develop critical thinking and work through problems step-by-step, rather than simply being fed answers. How Parents Can Support Their Child’s Use of AI It’s important for parents to monitor their child’s use of AI as they learn how to use it. Without proper guidance, children can easily overrely on AI and not develop the essential skills they need. Teach that AI Is a Tool The most valuable lessons parents can teach their child that AI is a tool, not the solution. It can work as a brainstorming partner, offer a new perspective, and compile resources for further learning. But it should never replace their own voice, creativity, or critical thinking. If you have concerns about how your child is using AI, take time to review their homework (if you don’t already). You’ll start to notice when AI may be taking a larger role than it should, since you know your child’s style and strengths best. Encourage Curiosity Curiosity is your child’s greatest asset, and AI can be one of many tools that help spark it. AI can open doors to explore topics more deeply than before and learn new things, but it doesn’t replace their own hands-on exploration or research. Remind them that curiosity means going beyond the quickest answer and that relying too much on AI can make it tempting to skip the deeper digging that fuels real learning. Staying curious can help them discover new interests in different subjects they may want to pursue as a career in the future. Explain AI Biases Children may not always understand that AI does not “think” on its own. It draws from patterns in the information it’s been trained on. This means it can sometimes provide incomplete, incorrect, or biased information. Teach your children about these limitations and encourage them to double-check facts, compare sources, and think critically about what they receive from AI. This will keep them safe and prevent them from believing misinformation. Stay Up-to-Date on AI News AI is rapidly changing weekly. As a parent, you should always know what’s happening in the industry. You don’t have to be an expert, but basic knowledge empowers you to put your child on the right education path. How College Admissions Use AI As your child gets older and starts looking at colleges, you need to know how colleges are using AI for both education and the admission process. According to a 2023 survey, half of higher education institutions were using AI in college admissions, with another 36% of colleges planning to implement AI by 2025. Colleges use AI to review recommendation letters (73%) and transcripts (71%). Admissions also use AI to communicate with potential students through chatbots or automated emails (61%). What’s especially important to know is that 87% of school admission employees say that AI sometimes or always makes the final decision to admit someone. Why does this matter? It should guide how students create their applications and essays . They need to focus on authenticity, storytelling, and personality. Proactivity Is Key for Parents in the Age of AI Parents should view their child’s AI use as an extension of their educational journey, not as a separate thing. When parents take control and involve themselves in how their child is using AI, they set them up for success. Children will retain their critical thinking and curiosity and use AI as a tool. If you’re unsure where to begin, schedule a free consultation . Our experts can help guide you and your child through this new technology and provide resources. We can also help with college applications and essays that truly reflect who they are.

With Ivy League colleges reducing their acceptance rates (Brown University was accepting only 5% in 2022 ), extracurricular activities and hobbies are more important than ever. In fact, 51% of admission officers find extracurricular activities moderately or considerably important. Remember, college applications are not just to list your child’s accomplishments. It’s the first impression a college admissions officer will have of your child. Learn how to highlight hobbies that look good on a college application to set your child up for the best future. Academic Activities that Go Beyond Grades Academics can be more than just grades. Scholarly extracurriculars can showcase your child’s interest in math, research, etc. Academic activities show curiosity, a determination to learn and grow, and dedication to their scholarly interests. Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA) Math club Coding club National Honor Society (NHS) Various academic competitions and Olympiads (especially if they win) Science/Physics/Biology/Chemistry club Robotics Future Health Professionals (HOSA) History club Economics club Astronomy club Debate club Mock law trials Leadership Roles and Initiatives Having documented leadership positions will help your child stand out from others because it shows they are not only responsible but also trusted by their peers. Additionally, if they have taken the initiative to create a new club or group, that should also be mentioned, no matter what type of activity it is. The president of any school club Captain of a team Being on the student council School event coordinator Youth city council member A position on the youth advisory board Model UN Solos in band or choir Founding member of a group or club Building community initiatives Creative Pursuits Some parents think that mentioning creative extracurricular activities isn’t necessary unless their child is pursuing a degree in the arts, but that’s not true. Arts can show your child’s passions and that they have a wide range of skills. If your child has published their writing or sold their art, that should also be included. Different art activities can include: Theater group Performing arts Painting Art competitions (and winning) Dancing Band Choir Graphic design Writing Painting community murals Yearbook Photography School newspaper Slam poetry Being part of arts festivals Pottery Sports and Physical Discipline Sports are always a good addition to a college application. Being part of a sports team shows your child can follow instructions, work in a team, and have stamina. However, it’s important to highlight these points in addition to their sports prowess. Football Basketball Soccer Lacrosse Field Hockey Hockey Cheerleading Track Swimming Volleyball Tennis Badminton Ultimate frisbee Martial arts Cross-country running Snowboarding Skiing Baseball Softball JROTC (technically not a sport but physically intensive) Volunteering and Community Involvement Volunteering doesn’t just show your child in a good light; it also shows that they pay attention to the world around them. Taking the initiative to improve their community shows passion and kindness. Depending on the activities, it can also show your child’s personal interests. Animal shelter Food pantry Homeless shelter Hospitals Nursing homes Environmental clean-up initiatives Campaigning for local politicians Interning for local politicians Assisting local nonprofits Mentoring children Food bank Participating in fundraising Hobbies That Show Personality To highlight your child’s personality, include their hobbies, even if they don’t seem traditionally “useful.” Passion always stands out on applications. Book club Chess Making YouTube videos Creating a podcast Creating a business Developing games 3D printing Website design Inventing things Bird watching Gardening Dungeons and Dragons Fashion design Learning foreign languages Exploring different cultures Make-up artist Puzzles Cooking What Colleges Admissions Officers Look for in Extracurriculars There are many different reasons it’s suggested that children highlight their extracurriculars on their college applications. It showcases various aspects of their characters: Commitment A common mistake high school students make is joining a bunch of different extracurriculars they think colleges will want to see—especially in the last two years of high school. However, it’s quality, not quantity. Colleges want to see commitment. The extracurriculars your child has been in the longest should be at the top of their list. Colleges want to see passion and dedication, and they can see that through how long your child has been part of a club, team, or group. Personality Traits Remember that college admissions see hundreds, if not thousands, of applications every year. They tend to see the same things: high GPA, volunteering, and extracurricular activities. These things no longer hold the same value as they once did. To best highlight your child’s extracurricular activities, your child needs to showcase their personality through their extracurricular activities. Your child should explain why they joined and stayed with their team or activity. A Story While there tends not to be a lot of space in a college application, your child needs to balance providing information and telling a story. Again, remember that admissions sees a lot of submissions, so to stand out, you need to entertain them. When discussing extracurricular activities, tell a story. Did your child volunteer at an animal shelter because they love animals and discovered their love of veterinary medicine? Did being a captain of their football team help your child realize they want to help lead people to greatness? This helps admission officers identify positive patterns and personality traits and see your child in a more well-rounded light. Showcase the Student, Not Their Accomplishments College admissions want to choose the best students possible, and sometimes accomplishments aren’t enough—especially if multiple students have the same achievements. Instead, focus on highlighting all the wonderful qualities of your child as a person. Showcase their passions, their curiosity, their dedication to the things that matter to them. That’s what’s going to stand out from the rest. InAmerica International can help them create a college application and essay that not only feels authentic but also catches attention. Between our firsthand experience in the admissions process and our network of educational advisors, we can help set your child up for success. We can even help them plan ahead, even when college is years away. Receive a free consultation today !

Artificial Intelligence has been evolving at lightning speed—just like the heatwave of this summer. In the past two months alone, we’ve seen practical new model iterations, massive capital investments, and governments around the world rolling out policies to accelerate AI development. Global consensus around AI cooperation is also beginning to take shape. In the U.S., the White House joined forces with more than 60 tech giants —including Adobe, Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, and NVIDIA—to launch the “American Youth Promise: Investing in AI Education” initiative. Meanwhile, top universities such as MIT, Harvard, Stanford, Yale, and Princeton have announced open access to their AI course resources, welcoming learners from all over the world. AI Talent in the Spotlight It’s not just academia. Leading entrepreneurs like Elon Musk are also fueling the AI boom. According to The Wall Street Journal , Musk’s SpaceX will invest $2 billion into xAI as part of a $5 billion fundraising round. At the same time, Google has pledged $25 billion toward power grid and data infrastructure projects over the next two years, underscoring AI’s central role in the future economy. And here’s the key: AI graduates are seeing incredible career prospects. A study from UC San Diego shows that AI-related undergraduate degree holders earn over $100,000 annually on average. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 predicts more than 5 million unfilled AI positions worldwide , with job growth expected to hit 21% —making AI one of the most sought-after “golden majors.” The 2025 CSRankings AI Top 30 in the U.S. Choosing the right school matters. The CSRankings list—recently updated for 2025—provides one of the most authoritative references for students pursuing AI. Unlike U.S. News, which leans on peer reviews and reputation, CSRankings focuses on academic influence, international impact, and faculty research output , offering a more transparent, research-driven perspective. Other notable universities in the Top 10 include the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor), UC Berkeley, and Johns Hopkins University. High-Value Universities Outside the Usual Rankings Several schools outside the U.S. overall Top 30 nevertheless cracked the AI Top 30, offering excellent cost-to-value opportunities : University of Massachusetts Amherst (#11) Penn State (#22) Northeastern University (#24) University of Central Florida (#24) University of Illinois Chicago (#27) Arizona State University (#28) Texas A&M University (#29) These universities not only have strong faculty resources, but also outstanding employment outcomes. For example, Texas A&M professors include leading ACM, AAAI, and AAAS members, and even Bjarne Stroustrup, the father of C++ , once served as a department chair. Northeastern boasts a 90%+ employment rate for CS graduates, enhanced by its co-op program and expansion into a new NYC campus. Why CSRankings Matters The methodology behind CSRankings is what makes it respected. Created by Prof. Emery Berger at UMass Amherst, the ranking is based solely on research publications at top-tier conferences (like CVPR, ICML, and ACL). Data is sourced transparently from the DBLP database , counting only first- and corresponding-author papers, and weighting scores fairly by author contributions. This means students can rely on CSRankings to reflect the true research strength of each university in AI and computer science. Spotlight: The AI Top 5 Universities 1. Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) Home of the U.S.’s first AI undergraduate degree and departments in machine learning and robotics. Strong faculty in computer systems, HCI, and interdisciplinary AI. Admission requirements include rigorous coursework in math, science, and English, plus standardized tests and English proficiency for internationals. 2. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) AI programs span Engineering, Information Sciences, and Liberal Arts & Sciences, with Grainger Engineering College leading the way. Focus on practical applications of AI research. Employment rate of 97% for engineering grads; CS average annual salary of $131,427 . 3. University of Maryland (UMD) Strong AI-related curriculum, with courses in planning, machine learning, NLP, game theory, and robotics. Recently launched the Maryland AI Interdisciplinary Institute . Offers minors in robotics and autonomous systems. 4. Georgia Institute of Technology (GT) Known as one of the “Big Three” tech schools. Undergraduate AI focuses on intelligence, humans, and devices. Offers AI/ML minors for students in multiple disciplines. Strong ties to national AI centers and a unique 5-year co-op program with tuition-free final year and paid internships. 5. University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Recently approved to offer a dedicated AI undergraduate degree (2024). Curriculum emphasizes applying AI in social and ethical contexts. Research culture highlighted by TritonGPT , the university’s custom campus AI. Final Thoughts AI is more than a buzzword—it’s a career-defining field that combines cutting-edge research with powerful industry applications. Choosing the right school is the first step toward unlocking that future. 👉 Explore our Elite Admissions Programs to see how we help students craft applications that open doors at the world’s most competitive AI universities.